29/04/2009 GMT 1
03/02/2009 GMT 1
Dive into Google Earth 5.0
![]() |
Google Earth 5.0, which launched today, expands Google's reach beneath the waves, allows free GPS uploads and even heads across the empty reaches of space to Mars.
Watery wonders
The biggest addition to the geological software package are 20 3D ocean layers, combining sea floor terrain and expert content (such as National Geographic articles and Jacques Cousteau videos) to let you explore some of the most difficult-to-reach parts of the world.
Virtual travelers to Hawaii, for example, can examine underwater volcanoes, see videos about the exotic marine life of the region, read about nearby shipwrecks and contribute photos and videos of favorite surf spots.
"It was a serious omission on our part not to include a better treatment of the oceans when we launched Google Earth," said John Hanke, Director of Google Earth and Maps. "I'm very happy that we've been able to address that."
Time travel
The other big feature launched today is Historical Imagery, a feature that enables users to virtually travel back in time through archival satellite and aerial imagery.
In previous versions of Google Earth, users could only view only one set of imagery for a given location. Now users can activate a time slider to see both newer and older satellite imagery from around the globe, enabling them to observe a single location's development over time.
Al Gore was on hand at the launch to note, "Now you can look back in time and see for yourself the unprecedented pace of change taking place on the Earth — largely because of human influences. For example, you can watch the melting of the largest glacier in Glacier National Park—the Grinnell Glacier—image by image, for the last decade."
Touring to Mars
Google Earth 5.0 sees three other major upgrades. A new Touring feature lets you create narrated tours of imagery and content in Google Earth by simply pressing a 'record' button, and which you can then share online.
Google Mars 3D includes high resolution imagery from the Red Planet, including fly-throughs to Olympus Mons, geo-located excerpts from A Traveller's Guide to Mars, and the points where various Mars Rovers and Landers have touched down.
Finally, GPS Tracking is now open to all users, letting you upload routes from many GPS units (including Garmin and Magellan units) to Googe Earth without having to pay for the Plus or Pro version.
You can download the new Google Earth 5.0 beta software now for free at http://earth.google.com/.
article source - uk.msn.com
02/02/2009 GMT 1
Twitter helps organises global fundraiser

If you're among the die-hard band of hold-outs that has yet to recognise the power of micro-blogging site Twitter, then a stunning demonstration of its power for good may change your mind.
Global non-profit group charity: water is currently using Twitter to lift awareness of its drive to bring clean water to the 1.1 billion people worldwide who currently don't have access to it.
Global awareness
Its next fundraiser, on 12 February, will involve participants in over 100 cities across the globe, all organised through Twitter.
The so-called Twestival 'Tweetup' – a meetup made on Twitter – was set up in just 24 hours – enough time to get people in 40 main cities involved.
No excuses
Once the ball was set rolling through Twitter word-of-mouth, the rest soon followed, with the result that the February fund-raising event is already well known and has been blogged about from Sydney to Lima.
The minimal effort needed to follow plans made on Twitter is clearly a factor in boosting participant numbers, so there's no excuse for not checking out the city list on the Twestival website.
Google breaks down, spreads global panic
![]() |
If you ever doubted the power of Google, then a minor snafu late Saturday exposed just how reliant the world is on the California search giant.
Anyone performing a simple search through Google got quite a shock when all results, no matter how innocent, came back marked "This site may harm your computer" - Google's standard designation applied to sites known to peddle malware, viruses and worse.
Online outrage
Although the problem was fixed within about 40 minutes, the almost-instant outpouring of internet outrage spoke volumes about the importance of Google - and its 235 million daily searches - remaining healthy.
Bloggers, Twitterers and journalists alike practically wept with worry about everything from getting information to how online stores might fail if no-one could visit them.
Our bad
As for the problem itself, it stemmed from a third-party list of suspicious sites that someone at Google uploaded wrongly.
The list featured a single entry containing just the character '/', which effectively told the search engine that absolutely all sites should be blacklisted.
Human error
Google Search vice president Marissa Mayer explained: "What happened? Very simply, human error... Fortunately, our on-call site reliability team found the problem quickly."
Almost choking on humble pie, the statement continued: "Our apologies to any of you who were inconvenienced ... and to site owners whose pages were incorrectly labelled. We will carefully investigate this incident and put more robust file checks in place to prevent it from happening again."
A Google UK spokesman we talked with early on Sunday confirmed the US line that Saturday's fault, "was caused by a human error on Google's part, and we fixed the issue as soon as we became aware of the problem."
Gmail issues
Although the problem has been dealt with, there may be lasting issues. The wonky malware filtering system also directed some legitimate email into Gmail's spam folder.
Google engineer Brad Taylor explained what to do: "We're working to roll out an automated fix to put these legitimate messages back into your inboxes, and we expect this to happen within a day. In the meantime, if you were expecting a critical message this morning, please check your spam folder."
28/02/2008 GMT 1
Now, enjoy great reads on mobile
| Wednesday, 27 February 2008 | |
Now, enjoy great reads on mobile
![]() |
Beware! That laptop could make you infertile!
| Wednesday, 27 February 2008 | |
Beware! That laptop could make you infertile!
![]() |
07/02/2008 GMT 1
Why banks love mobile banking
- To reduce costs. Banks hope to reduce calls to customer-service representatives for basic account information, like checking balances. The savings can be dramatic: While a chat with a phone rep costs the bank about $1 per minute, Gillen said, a one-way text costs just 3 cents.
- To improve fraud prevention. Mobile banking can allow banks to quickly notify customers of potentially fraudulent transactions and get a customer's OK before proceeding. Contacting customers via text or e-mail is cheaper than using call centers, and response times may be faster than when banks call a customer's land line.
- To trap you more firmly in their web of services. With the onset of electronic banking services, banks realized something interesting: The more technological services a customer adopts, the more likely he or she is to stay with the bank. If you use direct deposit, automatic debit and/or online bill payment, you understand this intuitively: It would be a major hassle to change banks. Adding mobile banking improves such "stickiness."
- To boost fee income down the line. Banks typically don't charge for mobile-banking access, but they hope to get a slice of the next step in mobile banking -- using your cell to make purchases.
Citibank is already experimenting with mobile payments. In one trial, the bank has partnered with MasterCard, AT&T and Nokia to put chips in Nokia phones that allow customers to make debit and credit card purchases by waving the phone at special point-of-sale devices at certain stores. In another pilot, Citi has partnered with Obopay to allow customers to send and receive money using any mobile phone.
That sounds pretty cool, but banks will still need to reassure customers that such transactions are safe. When Javelin polled consumers about whether they might try mobile banking, fully one-third said it sounded "too risky." Seven out of 10 worried that their personal information could be more easily obtained if their phone were lost or stolen, while 62% worried that their account could be compromised by hackers, spyware and viruses.
As I said earlier, there's currently not much risk, because:
- What you can do on your phone is pretty limited.
- Your account number typically isn't exposed; during the sign-up process, the bank "authenticates" your phone so you can use it to access your account without typing in the number.
- Hackers, virus writers and other bad guys are more interested in attacking your computer than your phone.
Right now, most malware and hacking attacks on mobile phones are more in the "nuisance" category than the real threat category. A bad guy might lock up your phone, plant a picture of a skull and crossbones on your screen or trick you into calling expensive 900 numbers.
Hackers are just getting started
That was pretty much the level of tomfoolery Web surfers encountered before e-commerce really took off, Egan warned. Once financial transactions soared, phishing, pharming and other far more sophisticated threats took over. He expects the same progression as more people adopt mobile banking and do more with it.
"Thieves always follow the money," Egan said. "Thieves followed the money to the desktop (computer) and they'll follow the money here."
Egan worries that banks will be too slow-moving to react to the evolving risks. Already, he said, many are overly confident that their recent efforts to boost online banking security will translate easily into knowing how to thwart mobile threats.
For now, here's what you need to know if you want to try out your bank's mobile capabilities:
- If available, try the browser-based version first. "Walk before you run," advises Egan. Browser-based applications are fairly simple to set up and use, while offering decent encryption.
- Don't store your user ID or password on your phone. Or at least tuck the information behind the extra security offered by add-on programs such as JSJ Wallet for Treos.
- If you can, download, update and use antivirus software on your Web-enabled phone. Antivirus products only are available for phones using Microsoft or Palm software, Egan said, and even then some users will run into problems trying to install security software on corporate phones.
- Ask what protections your bank offers against fraud. Some banks, including Wells Fargo, offer guarantees to their customers that they'll be made whole if they're defrauded because they used online or mobile banking.
- Shut down a lost or stolen phone account immediately. If you do lose a mobile-enabled device, your first call should be to your carrier to shut down service and your second to your bank to disable the mobile connection.
Is cell-phone banking safe?
Like the idea of using your phone to check your balance, pay a bill or even replace a debit or credit card? Banks do, too.
Something weird happened when I asked banks and other promoters of mobile banking about how secure it really is to use your cell phone to check balances, transfer funds, pay bills and perform other financial transactions.
Without exception, they mentioned how quickly people tend to notice a missing cell phone -- some said 18 minutes, some said 38 minutes. That, they said, narrowed the window in which an evildoer could access a mobile-enabled account.
I don't know about you, but it always makes me a bit nervous when the linchpin of a bank's security system is, well, me.
At this point, of course, there's not much a bad guy could do with my mobile-bank connection. As the banks like to say, he'd see about the same amount of information he'd get from picking up an ATM receipt.
He might see the balances in my checking and savings accounts; perhaps he maliciously could move money from one to the other or pay a bill for me. My bank account numbers aren't visible and I don't keep my user ID or password stored on the phone.
But mobile banking won't stay simple for long, and I'm not the only one who's disturbed by the banks' "don't worry your little head" attitude about mobile-banking security.
"There are too many people saying there's not a problem," said Bob Egan, chief analyst for research firm Tower Group and a man with 30 years' experience in information technology. "It's exactly the same thing I heard about e-commerce on the Web" when that was in its nascent stages.
Banks are going cellular, fast
To catch you up: After years of talking about the possibilities of using cell phones for banking, it's finally taking off.
Six of the 10 largest U.S. banks have introduced some kind of mobile-banking technology, according to information technology research firm Celent. By summer 2008, all the big banks are expected to have a mobile-banking option.
| Bank | Mobile technology | Launch date |
|---|---|---|
|
Bank of America |
Mobile browser |
March 2007 |
|
Citibank |
Downloadable application |
April 2007 |
|
Chase |
Text messaging |
Sept. 2007 |
|
SunTrust |
Preloaded application |
Winter 2007 |
|
Wachovia |
Mobile browser |
June 2005 |
|
Preloaded application |
Winter 2007 |
|
|
Wells Fargo |
Mobile browser |
July 2007 |
|
Text messaging |
In pilot phase |
|
|
Source: Celent |
Mobile banking is still in its toddler stage, of course. Only 3% of the 45 million or so households that currently use online banking have tried mobile banking, but Celent expects that to grow to 30% by 2010.
Consumers already seem interested in the possibilities. When Javelin Strategy & Research asked people what banking functions they might like to perform with a cell phone, 71% of respondents said checking balances, 41% said monitoring recent transactions and 25% said paying bills.
"I like being able to check my balance [in a store checkout line] before I use my debit card," said Celent banking senior analyst Red Gillen, who, like me, accesses his bank account using his Treo.
Such anywhere, anytime access can cut down on the possibility of a bounced-transaction fee by giving customers the options of forgoing purchases or quickly transferring money into their checking accounts.
Banks can deliver mobile banking in three basic ways:
- Through a phone's Web browser. Nearly all cell phones sold these days come with a browser, and the browser's WAP 2.0 security is pretty good, Egan said. But unless you have a phone with a keyboard, mobile banking is a bit cumbersome. Also, data charges on a cell phone can add up fast. If you don't already have one, you'll need to buy a data plan, which typically adds $30 or more to your monthly bill.
- Through a bank-specific application. This is something that's either already part of the phone you buy (preloaded) or that you get from your bank's Web site (downloadable). Again, you'll need a data plan. The download process can be difficult for a novice to navigate, although once enabled, accessing your bank is easier and faster than with a browser-based version.
- Via text messaging. Even old phones without browsers can send and receive texts, so this widens the potential banking audience considerably. But text messages typically aren't encrypted, and the functions you can perform are limited. Instead of one session, you might have a lot of back-and-forth texting to get the information you need.
In banking circles, preloaded or downloadable applications are considered the "sexiest" technology, Celent's Gillen said, with a better user interface and more possibilities for future expansion of banking services (I'll talk about that in a bit). But most banks, he said, will eventually employ a combination of all three technologies.
18/01/2008 GMT 1
New strain of virus hits computer e-mail
|
||
In this story: Virus changes subject and copy on each infection |
SANTA CLARA, California (CNN) -- A new strain of computer virus written in the same computer programming language as the "Love Bug" virus has struck several U.S.-based multinational companies, according to computer experts.
The new strain is called "VBS/NewLove.a," by McAfee, an anti-virus firm. At one company, 5,000 computers were infected, according to Dave Perry, spokesman at the anti-virus software company Trend Micro Inc. in Cupertino, California.
The virus apparently began spreading on Thursday. Some virus experts say it could be more dangerous than the "Love Bug" virus, if it becomes widespread.
Early Friday, anti-virus experts were watching to see whether companies in Asia are affected.
Some computer experts advise home and individual Microsoft Outlook users not to open forwarded messages containing attachments.
Eddy Hsia, director of engineering for McAfee, in Santa Clara, California, told CNN that his company had issued a "high threat" warning about the virus.
He said VBS/NewLove.a "could easily cause rampant damage" and would not necessarily be detected by the same anti-virus devices that caught "Love Bug."
Hsia said McAfee updated its detection equipment on Thursday, within two hours of detecting the new virus, and he urged companies to update their virus scanners as soon as possible.
He said new attachments to an e-mail -- the way in which the virus arrives -- should not be opened, especially if they are from people who have not been heard from for a while.
Hsia said it is too early to detect the source of the new strain.
Virus changes subject and copy on each infection
The VBS/NewLove.a virus, or worm, spreads when a user opens an attachment in Microsoft Outlook e-mail. The subject line of an infected e-mail starts with "FW:" and includes the name of a randomly chosen attachment from a previous e-mail on an infected computer.
The infected e-mail has an attachment with the same name, but ending in ".vbs." VBS stands for VisualBasic, the programming language in which it is written. "Love Bug," too, was written in VisualBasic.
Like "Love Bug" the virus can send itself to everybody in the user's address book. In that case, it can destroy most of the files on the hard drive, rendering the computer useless until the operating system is reinstalled.
The worm not only changes its message subject each time it infects, but each copy of the message is different from every other copy.
This is achieved, according to ICSA.net, part of the GartnerGroup of Companies based in Stamford, Connecticut, because "the worm uses a space-algorithm to pad comment lines in the VBS (Visual Basic Script) code, causing copies of the worm to lack identity with their progeny and siblings."
ICSA advises corporations and organizations to disable e-mail gateways until 3-mail containing .vbs attachments can be effectively filtered and quarantined.
Recovering deleted files
Home and individual users of Microsoft Outlook should not open forwarded messages containing attachments of any type, ICSA says.
With regard to recovering deleted files, ICSA says it will be very difficult. The infected files are overwritten by the virus and are recoverable only by restoration from backup.
Anti-virus companies are hoping that increased awareness prompted by the "Love Bug" will temper the spread of the new strain.
"Any time a virus hits a week after another virus its potency is diminished," said Perry. "People tend to be a little more cautious."
The "Love Bug" virus -- a strain different from the new and potentially even more destructive worm -- spawned at least 25 copycats with varying levels of destructiveness. Computer Economics, a Carlsbad, California-based research company, estimated that "Love Bug" and its variants caused $6.7 billion of damage.
The virus forced many businesses and government agencies -- from the Pentagon to Britain's Parliament to major companies such as Ford and Lucent -- to take down computer networks for protection and repair.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
New computer virus more destructive, but appears less infectious
(CNN) -- While a new and potentially more destructive computer virus uses the same replication scheme as the "ILOVEYOU" virus, the new bug's ambitious destruction program may curb its spread and eventually cause it to fizz out on its own, according to one computer expert.
Mikko Hypponen, director of virus research at anti-virus company F-Secure in Finland, said that while this virus -- dubbed "NewLove" -- can make a computer unbootable, it is not nearly as stealthy as "ILOVEYOU." The new computer worm is much less widespread than previous outbreaks and has built-in problems that will eventually make the virus expire on its own. A worm is a virus that is self-replicating.
"Unlike the original 'ILOVEYOU' virus, this one appears to have started, at least in significant part, in the United States rather than spreading from Asia to Europe to the United States," said Michael Vatis of the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Center.
U.S. federal sources said they would not rule out that the same people involved in launching the "ILOVEYOU" virus a few weeks ago may have been involved in this one.
Officials said apparently no U.S. government computers have been affected. Warnings were disseminated before the start of business Friday. "Hopefully, that will minimize the effects," said one federal government source.. "But it's too early to say what the impact has been or will be."
Despite its name, "NewLove" is not very similar to "ILOVEYOU," also known as Love Letter or Love Bug. The two are written in the same computer language, and Hypponen said the e-mail replication loop -- how the virus sends itself out to everyone in the user's Outlook address book -- is the same. Despite that, they are two different viruses.
"Otherwise, it's totally new code. But there's a common idea," Hypponen said.
Like the Love Letter virus, it only affects users of the Microsoft Windows 98 or 2000 operating systems, or Windows 95 users also running Internet Explorer 5.0. The virus also needs Microsoft's Outlook mail program to proliferate. The consumer version, Outlook Express, is not affected.
Rather than the same subject line each time, "NewLove" is polymorphic. Each time, it takes the name of a recently accessed file on the user's machine and uses that name, along with "FW:". This can work much better than "ILOVEYOU," because users can't be on the lookout for a specific subject line. Instead, the subject line may be a file name that is trusted -- especially among co-workers.
"It's really quite clever," Hypponen said. "It uses realistic file names and sends those to people you know. It's social engineering, just like we saw with Love Letter."
After replicating itself, the virus begins obliterating files. While Love Letter destroyed only JPEG image files, NewLove targets every single file on a user's hard drive. The worm will go through all local drives and all subdirectories. For each file, the worm creates a new file using the same name with the additional extension ".vbs" and deletes the original file. The new file is empty, effectively destroying all data on the machine. Then it does the same to networked hard drives, common in a company atmosphere.
The virus only does this to files for which the user has "write" permission, and files that are not currently in use. Still, it immediately makes the computer crash and become unbootable.
As frightening as that may be for users, it is also NewLove's downfall, Hypponen said.
"It's too destructive to become widespread," he said. "When you get hit by Love Letter, you may not notice it. The next time you hear about it is when someone calls you up and complains. But with NewLove, you open the attachment and immediately your machine crashes and won't boot again.
"It's never going to go around like Love Letter," he said, "because it's so obvious."
After being urged for more than one year to make Outlook less risky, the company is expected to offer a software patch next week.
"They've really done a 180 on this," said Chris Le Tocq of the Gartner Group. "The new fix that they have in Beta right now for Outlook completely removes programmability except as manually authorized in each case by the user.
"And this will break, frankly, a large number of corporate applications, but for the general user this is the right thing to do," he added.
Another quirk in the code can also limit how far NewLove gets around. Each time the virus replicates, it adds junk lines to its code. This, Hypponen said, is to keep the file size changing and make it more difficult to detect. However, NewLove only keeps adding junk lines to itself; it never takes them away. So every time it replicates, it grows.
Once the file size gets huge, slowdown and company limits on attachment size would stop the virus in its tracks.
"Eventually, it'll become 10 megs, 100 megs, 1 gig," Hypponen said. "It'll kill itself off. It becomes too fat."
Hypponen's predictions have so far been borne out by the lack of infection reports.
"We haven't received a single direct report of being infected," he said. "We've received secondhand reports from partners in the industry, but the total (companies infected) are 10 or 11." Those reports have been in Israel, central Europe and the United States.
But at each company, many computers could be affected and all data lost. At one firm, 5,000 computers were infected, according to Dave Perry, a spokesman at the anti-virus software company Trend Micro Inc. in Cupertino, California.
But now, Trend Micro is downplaying the total outbreak, saying it's not nearly as bad as expectations.
"It has hit a handful of companies," said spokeswoman Kristin Zoega, "but it's definitely not as widespread as Love Letter was."
As of late Thursday night, another anti-virus company, Symantec, reported three to nine companies had been hit. This is not even a drop in the bucket compared to Love Letter, which crippled mail servers and destroyed image files at tens of thousands of networks around the world just several weeks ago.
Love Letter spawned at least 25 copycats with varying levels of destructiveness. Computer Economics, a Carlsbad, California-based research company, estimated that the virus and its variants caused $6.7 billion of damage.
Hypponen expects variants on this virus, too. "Perhaps one that won't increase its size so much," he predicts.
Existing anti-virus updates against Love Letter are unlikely to affect this new virus. Hypponen suggests instead that users uninstall Windows Scripting Host, the program that allows VisualBasic scripts to run. Hypponen has detailed instructions on how to do this on F-Secure's Web site.
He said that "99.5 percent of users have no need for Windows Scripting Host. But a whole bunch of virus writers use it. I rest my case."
contributed to this report.

digg it
del.icio.us



